Brown Announces $13 Million Settlement With DIRECTV, Restitution to Customers

Ag brown Directv logo

Brown vs. Directv


Consumer Victory!!!

The Press Release says it all:

SAN DIEGO – Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today announced a $13 million settlement with DIRECTV plus restitution for customers who were subjected to the satellite TV company's misleading sales and marketing practices.

"DIRECTV won customers by offering special deals with hidden costs, and also extended customers' contracts without telling them," Brown said. "With this settlement, DIRECTV will reimburse customers and change its sales and advertising practices to comply with the law."

The settlement by Brown and 48 other state attorneys general was filed today in San Diego Superior Court. It requires DIRECTV to make full restitution to all victims. In addition, the company is required to pay $13.25 million to the 49 states and the District of Columbia in civil penalties and costs, and obey state laws.

DIRECTV, based in El Segundo, has more than 18 million subscribers nationwide with more than one million in California.

The multi-state investigation found the company engaged in practices that misled customers about how much they would be required to pay and what kind of programming they could expect. The investigation established that DIRECTV:

– Extended contracts without customers' knowledge. When the company serviced faulty DIRECTV equipment, its representative asked customers to sign what appeared to be service documents. Customers later learned that their signatures had extended their contacts for another two years.

– Failed to deliver promised channels. In its promotions, the company promised potential subscribers access to sports channels and local stations, but subscribers discovered that some of the promised programming was not available.

– Change the terms of promotions. The company offered cash-back deals and free trials but did not disclose key details, and some customers ended up paying more than expected. For example, DIRECTV offered a two-year deal at $29.99 a month (compared to a typical charge of $53.99 or $63.99) but did not disclose that the second year was at the regular price.

As part of today's settlement, DIRECTV agreed to clearly state all costs, services offered, length of contracts and terms of cancellations and refunds.

Brown's office is reviewing the 1,136 complaints it has received about DIRECTV to determine which customers are entitled to restitution. Complaints about conduct that occurred after January 1, 2007 are eligible for restitution. Californians who believe they were misled by DIRECTV have until June 9 to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at http://ag.ca.gov/consumers/general.php.

5 comments

  1. erik on

    Just another example of bad business practices. As an employee and subscriber of DISH network, it amazes me that such a large company is able to dupe so many people. Not only does DirecTV engage in shady business deals, they were also graded "F" for customer satisfaction by the BBB, while DISH was voted #1 in customer satisfaction by ACSI in 2010. We are looking to have another strong year, and certainly welcome anyone interested in starting a business relationship with a business that cares for it's customers. Take a look at Dish.com for more details.

  2. I learned so much of the article you had feature in the above discussion. I will be expecting more of the details you will provide with regards to social media. And also, I hope that there will be more of the information about the Lawyer Marketing.

  3. Leg injuries are major debilitating injuries. They prevent you from being mobile, can be painful and take a substantial amount of time to heal because they have to be strong to perform their weight bearing duties.Making a claim for broken leg injury compensation should be a straightforward process. If fact, there are a number of things in the process that have the potential to go wrong – possibly leaving you under-compensated and facing financial hardship.

  4. DIRECTV won customers by offering special deals with hidden costs, and also extended customers' contracts without telling them," Brown said. "With this settlement